Essay on “Affordable Housing” foreclosure:
Annie’s Ordeal By David M. Petrovich, Executive Director, SPOCH “Affordable Housing “ is supposed to be just that. Affordable. Though
many homes designated as affordable start out that way, they can end up on the foreclosure block. Many foreclosure narratives
share common threads. Many feature single, working Moms. Moms working full time hours, and many work at
two, part time jobs to make ends meet. Most have no health plan, no safety net, no voice. Encouraged by newly
created inventory of affordable housing made available to qualified low and moderate income buyers, many single Moms made
application for, qualified as low or moderate income buyers, then purchased ‘affordable’ housing units located
in large, condominium communities. Those experiencing financial hardship and being unable to cope with rising costs,
have fallen behind in their payments. Previously “affordable homes” are no longer affordable, and are at
risk of foreclosure. Before describing Annie’s ordeal, let me share what I know about affordable housing, and the
State’s Housing Affordability Service (HAS). New Jersey households with comparably
low, or moderate incomes have a hard time buying, or even renting in many communities throughout New Jersey.
Construed as a form of (financial) discrimination, laws were created to enable those less fortunate to experience the stability
of home ownership. The Council
on Affordable Housing (COAH) was created by the Fair Housing Act of 1985 as the State Legislature's response to a series of New Jersey Supreme Court cases known as the Mount
Laurel decisions. The Supreme Court established a constitutional obligation
for each of the 566 municipalities in the state to establish a realistic opportunity for the provision of fair share low and
moderate income housing obligations, generally through land use and zoning powers. The legislature provided an administrative
alternative to this constitutional obligation via the Fair Housing Act. COAH is empowered to: (1) define housing regions,
(2) estimate low and moderate income housing needs, (3) set criteria and guidelines for municipalities to determine and address
their own fair share numbers and then (4) review and approve housing elements/fair share plans and regional contribution agreements
(RCAs) for municipalities. As a quasi-judicial organization, COAH can also impose resource restraints and consider motions
regarding housing plans.1 What
is so-called affordable ‘program’ housing? Program housing can be selected, newly constructed units, or
existing, substandard dwellings rehabilitated, and then dedicated by deed as ‘affordable’ can be an act of benevolence
by public and/or charitable organizations, or involuntary compliance by developers to federal, state, and/or local housing
law. I say involuntary because developers want to maximize profitability, not to subsidize discounted
units... After communities are assigned their ‘fair share’ of affordable housing responsibility, and in its
effort to meet its responsibility, the community can impose minimal requirements for land use applications from the developers
of large scale housing projects. These applications are usually to first rezone farms or other open tracts, then develop
condominium or townhouse communities numbering from a dozen units, to several hundreds. Some of the units built are reserved
for low or moderate income buyers, and priced at less than market value. In an effort to offset the sale of less
profitable ‘affordable’ units, the developers seek to build more units (greater density) sold at market value. In
my experience, units designated as ‘low income program units’ are smaller and less well appointed compared to
neighboring, upgraded, non ‘program’ units. An affordable program home is introduced
to its restricted market either as a newly constructed or rehabilitated dwelling, or as a resale if a previously designated affordable
unit is placed on the market for sale by its current owner. To become eligible to purchase an affordable program home, prospective
buyers must now attend pre-purchase counseling, and qualify, financially, to complete their purchase. Most purchasers of affordable
housing finance their purchase using a small down payment and a mortgage loan, but some buyers paying cash who meet income
and residency criteria can still qualify for affordable program housing.
| Income Guidelines for Various Size Families (Monmouth-Ocean County) for 2004
|
| Income Classification (varies with family size)
| 1 Person Family |
2 Person Family | 3 Person Family |
4 Person Family | 8
Person Family | | Low
(80%)* | $40,250
| $46,000 |
$51,750 | $57,500
| $75,900 | |
Very Low (50%)* | $27,350
| $31,300 |
$35,200 | $39,100
| $51,600 | |
Extreme Low (30%)* | $16,400
| $18,750 | $21,100
| $23,450 | $29,350
| In 2005, prospective
buyers entered into a lottery system. When a specific unit meeting the size and price criteria becomes
available, the names of several, pre qualified potential buyers are selected. In descending order, the buyers are
contacted by an agent representing the housing authority. In the past, the authority’s real estate agent has been
responsible for confirming the buyer’s financial ability to purchase including having the necessary down payment, closing
costs, as well as income and creditworthiness to support a mortgage loan. If the prospective buyer enters into a contract
to purchase the unit, the agent then assists with the purchaser’s mortgage loan application process. If the buyer decides
not to pursue the purchase of that specific unit, his or her name is first crossed off that list, and returned to the
pool of prospective purchasers. If and when another unit becomes available, the process is repeated. Presently, the waiting
list for affordable housing exceeds five years in some parts of New Jersey.
Both
buyers and sellers of affordable housing face unique problems. Many potential purchasers
view the system of selection as unfair since it can be months or even years between opportunities to view and purchase a program
home as the demand far outpaces supply. Even when presented with the opportunity to purchase, many first-time buyers
find it difficult to make the decision to purchase. What might seem a no-brainer to you or me (a nice townhouse for $60,000,
$80,000, $100,000 or whatever) is to a first time buyer with limited resources it’s a major financial decision. The
available units are usually smaller in size, and constructed to an economy grade. Code worthy, yes, but minimally code worthy. Oftentimes,
Purchasers’ expectations are unfulfilled. In the resale units I’ve seen, the wall-to-wall carpeting is usually
well worn and walls in need of paint. Sinks are often chipped or discolored, as are bathtubs and toilets. Because
of the maximum resale price ceiling, there is no real incentive for the current owner to upgrade or replace worn or outdated
floor coverings, electrical fixtures, or appliances. Sellers have problems, too. When the dwelling is purchased, the new owners must
agree to and sign numerous documents including deed restrictions which dictate maximum resale price schedules, and maximum
refinance limits predicated upon a formula derived from the original purchase price, length of ownership, and sometime may
include a recovery for certain repairs or upgrades. For example, a seller may pass along the cost of a replacement heating
or air conditions system if the replacement was within a prescribed period before placing the home on the market. Each
year, the maximum resale price ceiling amount raises, slightly. Though the sellers are able to recover equity, they must
adhere to a prescribed, maximum selling price based on a percentage of its true market value. They are also limited to
selling to those from a select buyers pool. Many Sellers have entered into one or more contracts of sale with prospective
purchasers presumed qualified only to learn a few weeks or a month afterward of the buyer’s failure to secure mortgage
financing. Incompleted transactions waste time, and are an unwelcome expense to all parties. The Seller may incur attorney’s
fees as caution suggests each new contract be reviewed by an attorney. The buyer incurs mortgage loan application fees. Soon after divorcing her child’s
father, “Annie” entered into a series of relationships each lasting a year or two trying, in vain, to create a
stable home for herself and her young son. The last relationship, peppered by an escalation of domestic abuse, resulted in
her being on the receiving end of a thrown punch which broke her jaw and cracked several teeth. It was then she reluctantly
accepted an offer from her sister to move out of danger and into the safety of her small apartment. The move would not
solve Annie’s long term housing need. After almost two years of emotional and physical recovery, the two sisters managed their
work and childcare schedules quite well. Annie was able to contribute to the household expenses, and provide for her young
son’s needs. Even though things were going well, Annie came to realize the need to move on, and needed a home to
call her own. Encouraged
by her sister, Annie went through the state’s application and qualification process resulting in her selection of an
affordable program home. The formal mortgage loan application and approval took about 6 weeks. It was recommended
she hire a private home inspection service costing $250 which she didn’t think she had to spare. Even though she had
an idea what her closing costs could be, she knew she would need additional monies for utility security deposits and was watching
every penny. She passed on the home inspection which may have revealed some of the problems she would later encounter. The
big day, the day that she officially became a homeowner, finally arrived. The closing took about 90 minutes, her
hand numb from signing scores of documents. One of those documents contained provisions regarding the new owner’s
responsibilities when selling, or refinancing the mortgage on the unit. Immediately afterward, with help from friends and
family, she and her young son moved their possessions from a two bedroom apartment they had shared with a their relative,
into their new, two bedroom condominium home. After several years of shared and cramped living, they finally had a place of
their own and some much needed privacy. They each had a bedroom with its own closet. And, instead of four people
sharing a single bathroom, it was now all theirs! They had a refrigerator they would, for awhile, call their own. Two
months later the decade old refrigerator was deemed to be not cost effective to repair and needed to be replaced. The
prospect of having to purchase a replacement refrigerator so shortly after moving in would cause a strain to their already
strained budget. Annie didn’t have $600 to spend on a new refrigerator. But as a new homeowner, she was offered
instant approval for a big box store credit card account. She selected a basic, no-frills box and agreed to pay monthly
installments on a debt carrying a 21% interest rate. This was her first credit card, but not her last. The move into their new home certainly solved some problems,
but created some problems, too. Her school aged son needed daily after-school and week end care for several hours each
day until his Mom returned home from work, necessitating an extra trip. Now living on the outskirts of town and away
from public transportation, further away from her job(s), she must drive many miles back and forth between the school, her
(sister’s) former neighborhood and historic childcare provider, and then back to her home. These are not extraordinary
challenges, but challenges that must be negotiated. Seduced by the promise of easy credit and feeling entitled to safe transportation,
Annie traded in her nine year old heap and bought in its place, a new, modestly equipped, compact car, using a low
interest, 60 month bank loan.. Though she considered the extra $250 per month bite out of her budget for the car payment,
she failed to anticipate the marked increase in insurance premiums, adding an additional $100 to her monthly car payment,
further straining her budget. Over time, even though her wages didn’t keep pace, her costs of living increased
including telephone, cable, electric, heating fuel, etc. But still, she managed. Things looked brighter when Annie
was offered a full time position where she had worked, part-time, for several years. She wasn’t earning much more
money, but now had access to health care, and could more easily schedule her working hours to coincide with her son’s
school day. Still, there was little (financial) room to breathe. Constantly
treading water, should she stop, even for a minute, she would be in over her head, and likely drown. Coincidentally, water was the straw which broke her (financial) back. It was about two years following
her purchase when she returned home one afternoon to find a puddle of water streaming from the utility closet. The
floors were soaked, including the carpeting. After opening the rarely opened utility closet door, she saw a minor flood
in the making. Long story short, she needed to replace the water heater. And the floor underneath it. No big deal, but
the cost for its replacement was more than she had. But, needing an emergency replacement, she paid the repairman with a check
which, if she paid her mortgage, car payment, and credit card bills, would surely bounce. It was then she realized she was
headed for trouble, and turned to the small pile of envelopes, many unopened, containing offers from mortgage lenders. After looking over the reader-friendly advertisements, she decided to try to refinance her mortgage, hopefully
to cash out some equity, and then payoff her car loan and credit card bills. This is where her ordeal gets complicated. Don’t
forget Annie had purchased a deed restricted, affordable housing unit. Included in the folder of documents she had signed
at closing were guidelines to sell the unit, or refinance the mortgage loan. These guidelines were overlooked or ignored by
Annie, the appraiser hired to ascertain the condo’s value, the title company retained to issue a title report, and her
new lender. Bottom line: the lender approved Annie’s application for an amount greater than an amount technically
permitted Her new loan would exceed the maximum LTV (loan to value). Even though the terms of the
requested loan were changed on the day of closing, Annie agreed, and accepted the less favorable terms. Proceeds
from the new loan, were used to pay off her 30 year, fixed rate mortgage loan, her car loan, and her credit card bills. For
awhile, things were pretty good. The job she liked was going well. Her son was doing well in school and had made some
friends, and was even involved with an instructional baseball team.. Her home, though modestly furnished, was comfortable
and there was always something good to eat in the refrigerator. She was contentedly happy.
Then, one fateful day, the nurse at her son’s school
called her at work. “Your son is ill, and probably should go home,” the nurse said. This would
be the first of many calls from the school’s nurse. After numerous tests and office visits, doctors were able to
diagnose and treat the boy’s disease. Despite the diagnosis and prescribed treatment, Annie was missing work
on a regular basis to tend to her son who missed quite a bit of school and was in danger of failing his grade. Worried
and distracted, her job performance suffered. Her frequent absences from work resulted in a reprimand, and a warning that
additional absences would result in the termination of employment. Shortly thereafter, her position
changed, her hours were scaled back from full to part time and she was in trouble. On one hand, the extra ‘free’
time allowed her to tend to her son, but the ‘free’ time came with a cost. Her income dipped and she was
having trouble paying her bills. The first casualty was non payment of her quarterly condominium association fees. She
began to pay late her mortgage. Soon, she was running a month behind and falling further into delinquency heading to
default. The delinquency added an additional $50 in late fees to her already unaffordable payment each month. The thirty
day delinquency stretched to sixty. Soon, sixty turned into ninety at which time the loan was considered to be in default.
The homeowner will incur substantial, additional fees if the default isn’t cured and the the mortgage is foreclosed. Oftentimes
it’s the amount of additional foreclosure related fees that create an extra level of debt the borrower is unable to
overcome. In NJ, once a borrower
has defaulted to repayment terms, and the mortgage loan is in default, the lender must formally notify the borrower of its
intent to foreclose. Appropriately, the notice is called a notice of intent to foreclose. This gives the borrower
a period of 30 days to cure the default before the lender formally initiates a foreclosure lawsuit. The entire process
from default to sheriff’s sale can take 12 months. Even though this may seem like a lot of time... it isn’t. Events
leading to foreclosure don’t happen overnight, nor do the solutions to the problem become immediately apparent or implemented
overnight. So much precious time is wasted chasing ‘painless’ solutions that seem almost too good to be true...
So much time is wasted by ignoring the severity of the problem... oftentimes smelling the coffee after it’s too late
to benefit from a ‘best case’ workout scenario instead settling for a much less favorable case scenario in which
the borrower loses not only his or her home, but their equity, too. Instead of contacting her lender, Annie,
with money borrowed from her sister, brought the loan current, avoiding formal foreclosure. Then, the cycle repeated itself
ending with Annie taking more money from her sister. And again, the cycle appeared to repeat but this time the sister
wasn’t in the position, or willing to help. Again facing the prospect of foreclosure, Annie, referred from a local housing
counseling organization which out-sources pre-foreclosure counseling clients to my office, called for help.
Typically, we listen
to the Homeowner as he or she describe their hardship, and steps they’ve taken to resolve the matter. Usually,
this preliminary information furnished by the homeowner has been edited to exclude details which may not support a best
case workout scenario. We try to determine where they are in the collection process. All too often, they’ve waited too
long or simply don’t have sufficient resources readily available to cure the delinquency necessary to reinstate the
loan and avoid foreclosure. As a short term solution, Annie had used her sister like an ATM to buy a few extra months before a long
term solution became an absolute necessity. As with most callers, she was reluctant to divulge certain information... information
I would have preferred to have sooner than later including the fact she owned a designated affordable housing unit. Due
to the implicit but ignored deed restrictions, some conventionally accepted workout options were no longer applicable. The
problem, as mentioned earlier, was LTV, or loan to value. She owed more on her mortgage than permitted by established
affordable housing program guidelines. Conventional options no longer viable would include a mortgage refinance, or preforeclosure
sale. What then would be the prescribed
course of action? We would first have to review the refinance transaction to see who was responsible for permitting the
contraindicated refinance. Of course, Annie shares in this violation. Ultimately, it was her responsibility to adhere to the
conditions in her agreement to purchase and own a program unit. But who else? If additional responsibility is pinpointed,
perhaps financial concessions to restore conformity would be possible. I notified
both the housing authority and mortgagee of the problem, and requested documentation. I would need to confirm the deed restrictions
were lawfully recorded. I would need to confirm that the recorded information was available to both the appraiser, and
the title insuror. At
that point, I formally requested the mortgagee (including its appraiser and title insuror) accept partial responsibility for
failing to identify the mortgaged premises as having LTV caps via deed restriction. As a remedy to avoid foreclosure,
I requested the portion of the mortgage loan exceeding the maximum LTV be forgiven, and then the loan modified so it would
conform to applicable guidelines. The mortgagee has not yet responded to my certified letter(s), or repeated telephone calls. (I
later learned Annie had again borrowed ‘catch-up’ money from her sister... paying the mortgage, and stalling the
process undertaken to fix the problem. The mortgagee no longer viewed this matter as critical since the loan had been
reinstated and was not at risk of foreclosure.) Simultaneously, I sent notice to the applicable housing authority informing it
that one of its designated affordable housing units was at risk of foreclosure, and the Authority was at risk of losing one
of its affordable units, a unit it might have to replace in order to comply with the state’s affordable housing criteria. Since
the creation of an affordable housing unit is expensive, I proposed that preserving an existing affordable unit would be a
more cost effective solution. I proposed the Authority consider advancing the monies, in the form of a grant, to cure Annie’s
default. I later learned Annie had again borrowed ‘catch-up’ money from her sister... paying the mortgage, and
stalling the process undertaken to fix the problem. I can only assume the Authority no longer viewed this matter as critical
since the loan had been reinstated and was not at risk of foreclosure, pushing this matter to a back burner. Despite
another short term fix, the problem remained. Annie found a new job, but after a couple of months, she was soon unemployed. Foreclosure began once again, and Annie
has sought help from another agency... There are two issues that must be resolved in order for Annie to be able to keep her home. The matter
regarding her disregard of the deed restriction placing caps on refinance, is, in my opinion, resolvable. Though resolvable,
it will require continued cooperation from the Client. As in the case of many folks seeking help... results are possible
if they select a course of action and stick to the game plan. Switching horses in midstream is ill-advised. However,
even if this administrative matter is resolved, it may be pointless if Annie can’t maintain employment. This paramount
issue can only be resolved by Annie, and Annie alone.
1. From the NJ Department of Community Affairs web
page. Contact
S.P.O.C.H., a NJ, nonprofit 501c3 Housing Counseling Organization via
email @ NJSPOCH@aol.com, call: 732-571-9464, or visit its website: www.SPOCH.org
Adjustable Rate Mortgage loan resets, changes in bankruptcy
law, and the slowdown in the real estate market suggest a perfect storm on the horizon which should concern all NJ homeowners.
This session discusses how to identify, avoid, or cope with common threats to continued homeownership including eminent domain
(abuse), predatory lending, predatory real estate practices, and mortgage and tax lien foreclosure.
We welcome your comments, suggestions, experiences,
and complaints including Lender's Lies, fraud, and predatory lending. Feel free to log onto: SPOCH's Foreclosure News Forum
 |
 |
DON'T PANIC. Get detailed information about the deadlines you face. Pay special
attention to the date on which you would lose legal ownership of your home. NEVER SIGN
a contract under pressure. Take your time and consult an attorney if possible. NEVER
SIGN away ownership via a quitclaim
deed or other means without consulting with an attorney. NEVER MAKE your mortgage payments to anyone other than your lender.
If you can’t pay, never ignore warning letters from your lender. BEWARE of any home-sale contract in which you are not formally released
from liability for your mortgage loan. Make sure you know the rights you are giving up and that you agree to give them up. DON'T
SIGN ANYTHING with blank lines or
spaces because information could be added later without your knowledge or consent.
IF YOU DO NOT SPEAK OR UNDERSTAND English very well, never rely on the Buyer’s
translator. SI USTED NO HABLA NI ENTIENDE inglés bein, no confíe en el traductor del
comprador.
 |